American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Discover strategies to excel in the AICP Exam. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations. Gain confidence and readiness for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which zoning case involved the operation of a brickyard in metropolitan Los Angeles?

  1. Hadachek v. Sebastian

  2. Euclid v. Ambler Realty

  3. Jones v. Los Angeles

  4. Nectow v. Cambridge

The correct answer is: Hadachek v. Sebastian

Hadachek v. Sebastian is a landmark zoning case that involved the operation of a brickyard in metropolitan Los Angeles. The case arose when the city of Los Angeles attempted to enforce zoning regulations that prohibited the operation of a brickyard in a designated area, which Mr. Hadachek operated. The significance of this case lies in the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that upheld the zoning laws, affirming the city's right to regulate land use and restrict certain types of businesses for the sake of public health, safety, and general welfare. This decision established important precedents for zoning authority and the exercise of police power by municipalities, solidifying the legitimacy of zoning as a tool for urban planning. In comparison, the other cases listed address different aspects of property law and zoning. Euclid v. Ambler Realty primarily dealt with the constitutionality of zoning ordinances and their effects on property values. Jones v. Los Angeles focused on regulations surrounding the use of property in a different context, while Nectow v. Cambridge involved restrictions on land use that were deemed unconstitutional due to the lack of direct relation to public welfare. Each of these cases contributes to the broader understanding of land use regulations, but Hadachek v. Sebastian is specifically