Understanding Site Plan Review Submission Elements

When it comes to preparing for the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) exam, understanding the nuances of site plan review submissions is crucial. Now, let me ask you this—how well do you know what you need to include in these submissions? Knowing which elements are essential and which are optional can make a significant difference in your preparation.

Let's tackle the question: Which of the following would NOT be a required element of a site plan review submission package? The options are:

A. A location map
B. Indication of zoning setback requirements
C. Existing and proposed topography of the site
D. Contour lines at 1 and 2 foot intervals

The correct answer here is D. While contour lines can provide valuable insights into topography, they're not universally required for every site plan. But why is that important? Understanding the “why” behind the requirements can give you a leg up.

First off, a location map is more than just a pretty image—it gives reviewers the geographical context they need to evaluate a proposal accurately. It’s like giving people a compass and telling them, “Hey, here’s where you are in relation to everything else.” This is vital for planners who want to understand how the site fits into the wider landscape, including existing roads, infrastructure, and zoning districts. After all, you wouldn’t try to find your friend’s house without knowing the neighborhood, right?

Next, we have the indication of zoning setback requirements. This is all about compliance. Zoning laws dictate how far structures need to stand from property lines and other critical features—basically, the rules of the game when it comes to building. Knowing these setbacks ensures your proposed structures won't cause headaches down the line, like a neighbor complaint or—but let's hope not!—a visit from a zoning officer.

Now, existing and proposed topography—that’s where you really start to see the lay of the land. Planners need this information to assess how a project could impact drainage and soil stability. A site with a slope might tell you more than just whether you need a retaining wall; it could also provide clues about water drainage patterns, which are critical for environmental assessments. It’s like taking a step back and looking at a painting to understand its colors and textures.

So, what about those contour lines at 1 and 2-foot intervals? Sure, they may offer great detail, but their necessity can vary based on local regulations and the scale of the development. Not every project needs the level of detail those contour lines provide. Think of it this way—when you’re getting ready for a road trip, you don’t always need a comprehensive map of every tree and sign along the way; sometimes, a good GPS will do the trick!

In summary, while contour lines can enrich your understanding of a site’s topographical challenges, they often fall into the 'nice to have' rather than 'must have' category. Think about what makes the information critical in evaluating projects: geographical context, compliance with laws, and impact assessments. Focusing on these foundational elements will not only prepare you for exam questions but also for practical, real-world planning challenges.

As you gear up for the AICP exam, remember that knowledge of these essential components can set you apart. It’s not just about memorizing what’s required; it’s about understanding how these elements work together to create successful projects. And who knows? You might find that grappling with these planning elements gives you a deeper appreciation for the transformative power of thoughtful design in your community.