American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Discover strategies to excel in the AICP Exam. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations. Gain confidence and readiness for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which of the following constitutes a conflict of interest under the AICP Code of Ethics? I. A city employee working for a home-builder seeking Board approval of a project in the staff person's jurisdiction. II. Making unwelcome sexual advances to a co-worker. III. Using knowledge of land use planning activities to buy vacant property in an area to be planned for high density use. IV. Running for City Council.

  1. I and III

  2. II and III

  3. I, II, and III

  4. I, II, and IV

The correct answer is: I and III

The correct understanding of a conflict of interest under the AICP Code of Ethics is demonstrated by the first and third scenarios provided in the options. A conflict of interest arises when an individual's personal interests could potentially influence their professional responsibilities or decisions. In the first scenario, a city employee working for a home-builder who is seeking Board approval for a project within that employee's jurisdiction exemplifies a clear conflict of interest. The employee has a direct personal interest in the project due to their employer's stake in its approval, which could compromise their impartiality and objectivity in their professional role. The third scenario, which involves using knowledge of future land use planning activities to purchase vacant property designated for high-density use, likewise depicts a conflict of interest. This scenario highlights the ethical issue where privileged information might be exploited for personal financial gain, undermining the integrity of the planning process. While the second scenario regarding unwelcome sexual advances is indeed an ethical issue and a violation of workplace conduct, it does not fit specifically within the definition of a conflict of interest since it relates to harassment rather than a personal gain that affects professional duties. Similarly, running for City Council does not inherently create a conflict of interest unless the individual is in a position where their current responsibilities directly affect their campaign