American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Discover strategies to excel in the AICP Exam. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations. Gain confidence and readiness for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What might a lack of specific design criteria lead to in architectural reviews?

Better-designed projects
Inconsistencies and subjective evaluations
More community input
Fewer developments being proposed

The correct answer is: Inconsistencies and subjective evaluations

A lack of specific design criteria can lead to inconsistencies and subjective evaluations during architectural reviews. When clear standards or criteria are not established, reviewers may base their assessments on personal opinions rather than a uniform set of guidelines. This variability can create confusion among developers and architects about what is expected in their designs, potentially resulting in projects that are evaluated differently by different reviewers. Without specific criteria, the evaluation process can become highly variable, where one reviewer may prioritize aesthetics while another might focus on functionality or sustainability. This subjectivity not only undermines the review process but can also lead to frustration for project applicants who may receive mixed messages about the acceptability of their designs. Moreover, it may result in unpredictability regarding project approvals, which can ultimately deter high-quality design approaches that align well with community goals and planning objectives.