The decision of "fair share" of affordable housing was established in which landmark case?

The decision regarding the "fair share" of affordable housing is most closely associated with the landmark case of Mt. Laurel v. State of New Jersey. This case, decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court in 1975, established the principle that municipalities are required to provide their fair share of affordable housing to meet the needs of low-income residents. The ruling emphasized that exclusionary zoning practices, which prevent the development of affordable housing, are unconstitutional under the New Jersey Constitution.

In this case, the court found that local governments have an affirmative duty to accommodate low-income housing and that they cannot simply enact zoning laws that favor higher-income residents while neglecting the needs of lower-income families. This principle has since influenced housing policy not only in New Jersey but across the United States, promoting the idea that local governments must participate in addressing affordable housing shortages.

The other options do not directly address the concept of fair share housing. While cases like Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York primarily focus on zoning and land use regulations, Golden v. Planning Board of Ramapo deals with growth management, and New Jersey v. United States pertains to issues of sovereign immunity rather than housing policy. Thus, Mt. Laurel is the critical case that established the framework for