American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) Practice Exam

The landmark case that upheld the constitutionality of comprehensive zoning in the United States is Village of Euclid v. Amber Realty Co. This 1926 Supreme Court decision established that municipalities have the authority to enact zoning ordinances as a means of regulating land use and promoting public health, safety, and welfare.

The case involved a challenge to the Village of Euclid, Ohio's zoning ordinance, which restricted residential, commercial, and industrial uses within the community. The Supreme Court ruled that zoning regulations are a valid exercise of police power, affirming that it is permissible for local governments to determine how land is used within their jurisdictions. This decision provided a foundational basis for zoning law in the United States, allowing for local governments to implement zoning regulations without being unconstitutional, as long as they serve a legitimate public purpose.

The other cases listed do not deal specifically with comprehensive zoning or land use regulations in the same way. Therefore, Village of Euclid v. Amber Realty Co. stands out as the pivotal case in establishing the legal framework for comprehensive zoning.